In response to a podcast by The Spectator

The following unpublished letter was offered in response to a podcast in The Spectator:

Dear Letters Editor,

As a Christian Scientist, I’d like to give a different perspective on Damian Thompson’s Feb 28 podcast, because I see in my church energetic, committed, and joyful individuals. However, Mr. Thompson’s argument begs the question vital to the practice of all faith, namely, what about religion will actually last? If it isn't practical, real, revitalizing, what is religion for? 

Christian Scientists strive to experience practical Christianity through a religious practice that brings significant healing to their lives – morally, physically and spiritually. Just this week I read of a woman who was healed of an incurable blood disease as she began to study Christian Science.  For such individuals, church is not a dry theory of future hope, but a life-enhancing unfolding of good that stems from a dynamic understanding of Christ’s teaching.

Christian Scientists may be fewer than we were, not always meeting in buildings as impressive as in past decades. Yet true religion has never been about these external things alone. We are having to dig deeper into the heart of our faith and are revitalized by it. 

Robin Harragin Hussey

Christian Science Committee on Publication

London

WC2N 4JF

Previous
Previous

Does the Christian Science church have plans to help the needy?

Next
Next

Response to the Telegraph: 48 Hours in Boston